Lately I've been seeing a lot articles on the good ol' interwebs about certain iconic PC titles that will be turning 20 this year. That got me thinking: I've been a gamer for a pretty long time now. What was I playing some 20 years back? What were some of the other guys from Twinstiq playing then? So I'm going to talk briefly about a couple of titles that really cemented me into the PC gamer category, And we'll hear from a few of the crew about what they had going on from that era as well. Join me in my and a few of the crew's ramblings below. Read more
After the release of the first entry in 2008, which we covered last time, TaleWorlds continued listening to feedback from the community and in 2010 it was time for Mount & Blade: Warband, a sort of semi-sequel.
At a quick look, it didn’t offer many new features: Slightly fancier graphics, a new faction, some UI improvements. Peek deeper though, and you’ll find a first step towards a tutorial. A scripted mission, guiding you into this new world you are about to explore (without pulling any punches along the way, at least for people new to the series). A bit deeper even, and you’ll find a still lacking, but at least now existing political system, allowing you to build relationships with one of the many lords, kings and queens. And then finally the option to start your very own faction.
All of these changes and additions in Warband were certainly needed and the singleplayer experience was a much better one for it, but wait a second… why did I just deliberately name drop singleplayer, you might wonder.
When it comes to people who played any of the previous Mount & Blade versions, you can probably put most of them into one of two categories: Those that gave up on it after a couple of hours, maybe even multiple times, and those that completely lost themselves in it.
I was in the former one for many years, ever since discovering the beta for the very first entry.
The games, while somewhat deep and certainly complex in their nature, left too many gaps to fill in my mind. This is not a bad thing necessarily, but a couple of design decisions, like having traversable 3D cities & fiefdoms void of life and meaningful interaction, actively hampered my imagination to take lead. How can I role play, when all I see is a world that is as dynamic as glued together Lego bricks, filled with people whose only purpose in life is to stand in a corner or walk aimlessly around town?
Mount & Blade was a project full of passion. Passion that lead to ambition. Ambitions too large for ressourceless indie developers releasing their first game, especially in the year 2008. It was a project destined to fail ...but it never did.
The reasons for this are manifold. Armağan Yavuz and his wife Ipek took things slow, but they were persistent in their pursuit. The first prototypes were available to the public as early as 2004, when the game was still called WarRider and featured undead and necromancers. The re-brand to Mount & Blade then removed the magic elements and went for a more realistic approach in its setting, which still was based in a fictional world however. This, in turn, helped them bring out one of their outstanding features: the combat.
Developing a somewhat realistic sword and arrow based combat system that is fun when you are in a one on one situation is hard, but making it also work when there are 50 enemies and as many allies, had to be the designers biggest achievement. Sure, there were still AI problems, mostly when it came to siege warfare, but no other developer ever even came close to what TaleWorlds accomplished.
So the thing that drew in the customer was there, but without a marketing budget and still so early in development, much of its early success can be attributed to the aforementioned public availability as shareware. Sharing sites, CD's included in gaming magazines, LAN parties. As a hardcore PC gamer, you were bound to stumble upon the game at some point during its development. And for the hardcore it was.
Remember when I talked about glued together Lego Bricks? That wasn’t the only hurdle you had to jump on your way to enjoying Mount & Blade. While the basic combat principles were adequately explained, the game had much more to offer which wasn’t.
What’s up with all these stats? Where am I? Where should I go? How do I command my army? How do I get my own piece of land?
Internet message boards were “work” and with YouTube still very much in its infancy (remember: YouTube only started 2005 and it would take another two years until the phrase Let’s Play was even coined), there was no easy way to learn the ropes. Failing was something you would have to get used to. Failing was also something that had its consequences. There was no permadeath (unless you decided to mod it in), but getting knocked out in a fight and becoming a prisoner, especially in the early to early mid-game, could easily mean that you’ve just lost a huge chunk of progress. Armies aren’t cheap, so you are now probably stranded somewhere in enemy territory, without a soul by your side or a sack of gold to pay for company or goods to trade. You maybe even lost your horse, so prepare for a long and arduous journey back.